Illegals go home as Mexico economy improves

Improving Mexican economy draws undocumented immigrants home from California

Published: Thursday, Jul. 28, 2011 – 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Thursday, Jul. 28, 2011 – 11:16 am

There are fewer undocumented immigrants in California – and the Sacramento region – because many are now finding the American dream south of the border.

“It’s now easier to buy homes on credit, find a job and access higher education in Mexico,” Sacramento’s Mexican consul general, Carlos González Gutiérrez, said Wednesday. “We have become a middle-class country.”

Mexico’s unemployment rate is now 4.9 percent, compared with 9.4 percent joblessness in the United States.

An estimated 300,000 undocumented immigrants have left California since 2008, though the remaining 2.6 million still make up 7 percent of the population and 9 percent of the labor force, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.

Among metropolitan areas with more than 1 million residents, Sacramento County ranks among the lowest, with an unauthorized population of 4.6 percent of its 1.4 million residents in 2008, according to Laura Hill, a demographer with the PPIC.

The Sacramento region, suffering from 12.3 percent unemployment and the construction bust, may have triggered a large exodus of undocumented immigrants, González Gutiérrez said.

The best-paid jobs for undocumented migrants are in the building industry, “and because of the severe crisis in the construction business here, their first response has been to move into the service industry,” González Gutiérrez said. “But that has its limits. Then, they move to other areas in the U.S. to find better jobs – or back to Mexico.”

Hill said it’s hard to know whether the benefit of having fewer undocumented migrants outweighs the cost to employers and taxpayers.

California may have to provide less free education to the children of undocumented immigrants and less emergency medical care, she said, but it will also get less tax revenue.

In 2008, at least 836,100 undocumented immigrants filed U.S. tax returns in California using individual tax identification numbers known as ITINS, said Hill, who conducted the tax survey.

Based on those tax returns, the study found there were 65,000 undocumented immigrants in Sacramento County that year, far fewer than in many other big counties.

Sacramento’s undocumented population ranked 10th in the state that year, behind Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Santa Clara, San Bernardino, Riverside, Alameda, Contra Costa and Ventura.

There were an estimated 12,000 undocumented immigrants in Yolo County; 9,000 in the Sutter-Yuba area; and 8,000 in Placer County.

An analysis of local ZIP codes showed that Sacramento (95815, 95823, 95824), West Sacramento (95605), Clarksburg (95612), Esparto (95627), Guinda (95637), Knights Landing (95645), Winters (95694) and Woodland (95776) each had an undocumented population of 10 percent to 15 percent.

Yolo County relies heavily on migrant workers to grow and harvest crops.

“People in construction are now turning to agriculture; it’s the start of the tomato season so the harvesters will be jump-started pretty soon,” said Woodland Mayor Art Pimentel, whose 55,000 residents are 48 percent Latino, some of them undocumented.

Some aren’t sticking around for the upcoming tomato harvest, said Sylvina Frausto, secretary of Holy Rosary Church in Woodland. “Some have a small parcel in Mexico. They own their own home there, so instead of renting here they go back to their small business there.”

Many raise animals, run grocery stores or sell fruits and goods on street corners.

“They’re going back home because they can’t get medical help or government assistance anymore,” Frausto said, “And when it’s getting so difficult for them to find a job without proper documentation, it’s pushing them away.”

Anita Barnes, director of La Familia Counseling Center on Franklin Boulevard in Sacramento, said she recently spoke to a high school graduate who had lost his job in a restaurant and was thinking of going back to Mexico.

“He came over with his mom, who was in the process of losing her restaurant job,” Barnes said. “It’s frightening, especially for the children. They feel this is their country, they don’t know anything else, and they find they can’t get driver’s licenses or jobs.”

As its economy rebounds, Mexico “is becoming a better option than it was in the past, but you still have to find a job and reconnect,” Barnes said.

While the weakened U.S. economy, rising deportations and tougher border enforcement have led to fewer undocumented migrants, changes in Mexico are playing a significant role, González Gutiérrez said.

Mexico’s average standard of living – including health, education and per capita income – is now higher than those in Russia, China and India, according to the United Nations.

Mexico’s growing middle class “reduces the appetites to come because there are simply many more options” at home, González Gutiérrez said. “Most people who decided to migrate already have a job in Mexico and tend to be the most ambitious and attracted to the income gap between the U.S. and Mexico.”

Mexico’s economy is growing at 4 percent to 5 percent, benefiting from low inflation, exports and a strong banking system, the consul said.

Mexico’s birthrate is also declining sharply. “As a natural consequence of us transforming from a rural to an urban society, we are running out of Mexicans to export,” González Gutiérrez said. “Our society’s growing at a rate of 2.1 children per woman – in the 1970s it was more than five.”

Once the U.S. economy recovers, the flow of migrants moving north “may go up again, although most likely they will not reach the peak levels we saw in the first half of the decade,” González Gutiérrez said.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/07/28/3799513/improving-mexican-economy-draws.html#ixzz1TXuIFI62

Cross posted to http://wcma2.wordpress.com/

The no votes: 22 GOPers who balked Boehner

I’m so proud to be a citizen of South Carolina.  :D

July 29, 2011
Categories:

The no votes: 22 GOPers who balked Boehner

Speaker John Boehner pushed his debt-ceiling bill through the House Friday night with the support of 218 Republicans. Here are the 22 no votes:

Justin Amash (Mich.)
Michele Bachmann (Minn.)
Chip Cravaack (Minn.)

Jason Chaffetz (Utah)
Scott Desjarlais (Tenn.)
Tom Graves (Ga.)
Tim Huelskamp (Kans.)
Steve King (Iowa)
Tim Johnson (Ill.)
Tom McClintock (Calif.)
Mick Mulvaney (S.C.)
Ron Paul (Texas)
Connie Mack (Fla.)
Jim Jordan (Ohio)
Tim Scott (S.C.)
Paul Broun (Ga.)
Tom Latham (Iowa)
Jeff Duncan (S.C.)
Trey Gowdy (S.C.)
Steve Southerland (Fla.)
Joe Walsh (Ill.)
Joe Wilson (S.C.)

CORRECTED: Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) voted YES on the Boehner bill. That was incorrect in the initial list. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) has been added to the list.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0711/The_no_votes_22_GOPers_who_balked_Boehner_.html

BREAKING NEWS: House Passes Boehner’s Debt Limit Bill, 218-210

House of Representatives
Boehner’s Revised Debt-Limit Bill Passes House, Heads for Senate

Published July 29, 2011

House Speaker John Boehner, center, joined by other GOP leaders, discusses the debt ceiling July 25 on Capitol Hill.

With the U.S. moving perilously closer to default on its loans to cover years of deficit spending,the House on Friday narrowly passed Speaker John Boehner’s third version of a debt-limit bill that includes a balanced budget amendment that secured the support of hard-line Republicans.

But no Democrats voted for the plan and 22 Republicans defected. With 240 Republicans in the House, Boehner could only afford to lose 23 members, which showed how razor-thin the vote was.

Boehner rallied his troops around his plan in a passionate speech on the House floor ahead of the vote that drew roaring applause from Republicans.

“I stuck my neck out a mile to get an agreement with the president of the United States,” he said. “It’s time for the administration and time for our colleagues across the aisle to put something on the table. Tell us where you are!”

House Democrats, most of whom had no intention of supporting any version of Boehner’s plan, pounced on the addition of the balanced budget provision.

“In the last 24 hours, we’ve confirmed what many people suspected, which is that the Tea Party Republicans may be a noisy and effective protest movement, but they are unfit to govern,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.

Meanwhile, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid vowed to kill the Boehner bill once it arrives in the Senate and said he plans to move ahead with his own proposal to cut $2.5 trillion from the deficit over a decade.

But he realized time is short. So he pledged to work with Senate Republicans on a compromise with a procedural vote Friday night, leading to possible votes before dawn Sunday morning.

“The last train is leaving the station,” he said. “This is our last chance to avert a default. The vote on this compromise will determine whether we enter the frightening world of default.”

Earlier Friday, President Obama said it’s time to move forward with debt-reduction legislation that can be supported by both political parties. Obama said Reid has introduced cuts that can be supported by Republicans and Democrats, adding that he needs a plan he can sign by Tuesday, the deadline imposed by the administration as the drop-dead date for avoiding default.

“We are almost out of time. We need to reach a compromise by Tuesday so the country can afford to pay its bills on time, as it always have. … Keep in mind if we don’t do that, if we don’t come to an agreement, we could lose our credit rating, ” Obama said in the latest of several addresses to the nation, including a prime-time address at the beginning of the week.

“It’s clear now that any solution to avoid default must have the support of both parties,” he added, noting that if the nation’s credit rating were downgraded it would be because “we didn’t have a triple-A political system to match our triple-A credit rating.”

Boehner, R-Ohio, suffered a stinging setback Thursday when, for a second consecutive day, he had to postpone a vote on his proposal to extend the nation’s borrowing authority for six months while cutting federal spending by nearly $1 trillion.

Boehner’s new provision for a balanced budget amendment would appear to have been the sweetener needed to win over as many as two-dozen holdout Republicans who want greater cuts in federal spending before agreeing to hike the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.

Prior to Boehner’s announcement, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said he was a “no” on Boehner bill until something is added that is “trans-election cycle, trans-systemic, and transformative.” That would include something like a balanced budget amendment. he said, noting if that promise were included, then he “would embrace it.”

While such a move could motivate Republicans, it would not get any traction in the Senate, which wants a longer-term agreement that would raise the limit to pay for deficit spending through 2012.

On the opposite side of the Capitol, Reid passed on warnings by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner that the prospects of default are growing.

The international community is very worried, Reid said Geithner told him, adding that the ability to get loans will become more difficult. Credit ratings agencies have also warned that unless Congress gets on a serious path to debt reduction, it could reduce the country’s stellar AAA rating.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/29/reid-prepares-alternative-proposal-to-raise-debt-ceiling/#ixzz1TXLcml6v

 

Judge to Texas…Give illegals driver licenses!

Judge Prohibits Texas From Denying Driver’s Licenses to Legal Immigrants

By

Published July 29, 2011

 

rick_perry_062311

In this June 23, 2011 file photo, Texas Gov. Rick Perry speaks during the 28th annual National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials conference in San Antonio.

A judge this week ruled this week that Texas can no longer deny driver’s licenses to legal immigrants with temporary visas and must issue standard licenses instead of non-standard ones approved by a state panel three years ago.

Judge Orlinda Naranjo said in a ruling Wednesday that the Texas Department of Public Safety exceeded its legal authority when it adopted a policy in 2008 as part of a crackdown on identity theft and fraud that requires immigrants applying for driver’s licenses to prove they’re in the country legally.

Gov. Rick Perry, a popular choice among Republicans looking for a 2012 GOP presidential contender, supported the policy that was a blueprint for a new law that is set to take effect at the end of this September. Under the law, all legal immigrants with visas authorized for less than one year or scheduled to expire in less than six months are still entitled to standard-issued driver’s licenses.

“The governor continues to support requiring driver’s license applicants to prove they are in the country legally before being issued a license,” Perry spokeswoman Lucy Nashed said in an email to FoxNews.com.

The debate over driving privileges for illegal immigrants has raged across the country with most states prohibiting it but others considering a two-tiered licensing system. But driving privileges for legal immigrants is more standard fare in the states.

In Texas, the ruling is a victory for immigrant rights groups who said that thousands were denied standard-issued licenses even though they had valid immigration documents issued by the federal government.

“The unlawful DPS attempt to deny licenses to immigrants violated our national tradition and aspiration, so we welcome the court’s wise ruling,” said Thomas Saenz, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), a Latino civil rights group.

MALDEF sued the state on behalf of six immigrants and a landscaping business that employs foreign workers under the federal H-2B visa program. That program allows companies to hire temporary foreign workers after certifying that they can find no American workers to take the jobs.

“We are very pleased that the court halted DPS from implementing its own arbitrary, misguided policies that denied licenses to hardworking immigrants living in the United States with permission,” said David Hinojosa, MALDEF Southwest Regional Counsel and lead attorney in the case.

“These irrational policies have not only affected those immigrants and their families, causing them to suffer from discrimination, but also impacted hundreds of Texas businesses who legally employ immigrants, and we are glad to put an end to the senseless action.”

A DPS spokesman declined to comment. The state is appealing the ruling and DPS can continue its policy until the new law takes effect.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/29/judge-prohibits-texas-from-denying-drivers-licenses-to-legal-immigrants/#ixzz1TXHO9BvJ

SC Dems hit gov for saying she’s white on ’01 form

By JIM DAVENPORT
Associated Press
Published: Thursday, July 28, 2011 at 10:07 p.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, July 28, 2011 at 10:07 p.m.

South Carolina Democrats on Thursday seized on a 10-year-old voter registration document for Gov. Nikki Haley to claim the Republican uses her Indian-American heritage when it’s convenient because it lists her race as “W” for white.

Haley was elected the state’s first female governor in November and the nation’s second Indian-American chief executive.

Her parents emigrated from India and Haley was born in Bamberg County, S.C., a county split between whites and blacks. Born Nimrata Randhawa, she frequently credits her different heritage with helping her get beyond race and finding problems that many have in common.

South Carolina Democratic Party Chairman Dick Harpootlian said the 2001 document the party unearthed shows the 39-year-old Haley plays on her race for political convenience.

“She can’t even tell the truth about her racial heritage,” Harpootlian said.

Haley spokesman Trey Walker said the governor’s office did not plan to respond to the Democrats. State Republican Party Executive Director Matt Moore called Harpootlian’s criticism “just more theatrics and that’s all there is to it.”

Haley’s 2001 voter registration application was derived from information already on her driver’s license.

It was not clear when that information may have been provided, or what options were even available on the form for racial identifiers when it was given.

South Carolina’s current driver’s license application asks people to identify their race as white, black, Hispanic, Asian or Indian, according to instructions for the form. It doesn’t specify whether the description “Indian” refers to someone who is American Indian or whose parents came from India, but it traditionally refers to the former on government forms.

The voter application Haley signed in March 2001 first was obtained by Democrats. The Associated Press independently viewed a copy Thursday provided by the Lexington County Commission of Registration and Elections.

State Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said so-called motor voter forms have much of their information filled out automatically at Department of Motor Vehicle offices using driver’s license information already on file.

Nearly all of the information on Haley’s 2001 application was automatically filled out. The only handwriting on the form is her signature and the date.

A state agency spokesman said privacy laws prohibit the release of Haley’s driver’s license application. It’s unclear how she may have identified herself when getting it renewed.

Whitmire and Dean Crepes, the Lexington voter registration and election director, said people can list anything they want for race on voter forms.

Whitmire said race information is important because it helps the state gather statistical data that is used to show whether the state is complying with the federal Voting Rights Act and not discriminating against voters.

http://www.blueridgenow.com/article/20110728/APA/1107281095

South Carolina Governor Rejects NAACP Push to Remove Confederate Flag

By

Published July 29, 2011

confederate.jpg

Reuters

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley isn’t retreating from her decision to keep the Confederate flag atop the north end of the Statehouse in Columbia despite complaints from the NAACP, whose president this week said the ethnic minority governor is a “contradiction” for allowing the flag to fly.

Speaking to a crowd at an NAACP national conference in Los Angeles on Monday, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous attempted to shame Haley into removing the flag by comparing African American slavery to oppression Haley’s ancestors in India faced under British rule.

 ”Perhaps one of the most perplexing examples of the contradictions of this moment in history is that Nikki Haley, South Carolina’s first governor of color, continues to fly the Confederate flag in front of her state’s capitol. Given the similarities between our struggles to end slavery and segregation, and her ancestors’ struggle to end British colonialism and oppression in India, my question to Governor Haley is one that Dr. King often asked himself: ‘What would Gandhi do?’” Jealous said.

The flag has been at the north end of the Statehouse since 2000. It was moved there after legislation passed in response to protests and an NAACP boycott of the state over the flag’s position atop the dome of the Statehouse, where it was placed in 1962 by an all-white South Carolina Legislature.

Haley was born in South Carolina, and her spokesman said the decision lies with the people of the Palmetto State.

“More than a decade ago, under the leadership of a Democratic governor, South Carolinians Republican and Democrat, black and white, came to a compromise position on the Confederate flag,” said Haley press secretary, Rob Godfrey.

“Many people were uncomfortable with that compromise, but it addressed a sensitive subject in a way that South Carolina as a whole could accept. We don’t expect people from outside of the state to understand that dynamic, but revisiting that issue is not part of the governor’s agenda,” Godfrey said.

The NAACP boycott remains in place as a protest to the decision to keep the flag beside a monument honoring fallen Confederate soldiers. Opponents say flag should be removed completely from Statehouse grounds because it represents slavery and white supremacy.

The NCAA also refuses to hold any tournaments in the state as long as the Confederate flag continues to fly there.

But others say the flag is a reminder of an important part of South Carolina’s history, not to mention that it doesn’t violate any laws.

“There is nothing more sacred in the country than the First Amendment. If someone wants to raise that flag then they have the First Amendment right to do so,” said attorney Richard Roth of The Roth Law Firm, PLLC in New York City.

Roth, who has argued several First Amendment cases before the federal courts, noted that South Carolina is the only state with any legal limitation on flying the Confederate flag.

“It may not be good for business and it may not be good for a general character and reputation, but legally you have every right to fly any flag,” said Roth.

fox news

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/28/naacp-urges-nikki-haley-to-remove-confederate-flag/#ixzz1TWd9qHeK

“Get your ass in line,” Boehner reportedly told wavering members.

Get in Line

By on 7.28.11 @ 6:09AM

It’s getting ugly on Capitol Hill, folks. This week, congressional Republicans have gone from holding the president and their leadership’s feet to the fire to becoming a circular firing squad.

Conservatives were in full revolt against House Speaker John Boehner’s two-step plan to raise the debt ceiling by the August 2 deadline after the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found his accompanying spending cuts wanting. Perhaps it was payback from the last crisis, when GOP congressmen were stampeded into voting for a deal that would avoid a government shutdown, only to learn that it cut just $352 million from the current year’s deficit.

Bamboozled time and again by Democratic presidents and their own leadership, many rank-and-file conservatives just don’t believe fiscal discipline that must be maintained by future Congresses will ever materialize. They are unwilling to raise either taxes or the federal debt limit in exchange for phantom spending cuts.

Staffers for the conservative Republican Study Committee (RSC) were caught aiding outside conservative activists who opposed the Boehner plan and wanted the GOP to stick to Cut, Cap and Balance. RSC aide Wesley Goodman fired off an email Tuesday saying “now is the time to kill the Boehner deal,” requesting “statements coming up to the Hill every hour of the day in mounting opposition to the plan.”

“Fire him, fire him!” GOP lawmakers chanted of Goodman and RSC executive director Paul Teller. Some lawmakers, including those listed as “Members to Target” in defeating the Boehner plan, are considering withholding dues or even pulling out of the RSC. Party elders like Sen. John McCain described the Tea Party freshmen as “foolish” in their demands.

Late Wednesday, there were signs that the speaker was quelling this conservative rebellion. Boehner revised the plan to include $22 billion in deficit reduction in the first year and to cut and cap spending by an amount that exceeds the debt ceiling increase by $17 billion, according to the updated CBO score circulated by the speaker’s press office. “Get your ass in line,” Boehner reportedly told wavering members.

They may be complying. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who has at times seemed to be positioning himself to Boehner’s right in the debt ceiling debate, pronounced himself “150 percent” in the speaker’s corner. According to press reports, Cantor exhorted members to quit their “whining” and vote for the Boehner plan. “The debt limit vote sucks,” Cantor is said to have admitted, but it was time to “call the president’s bluff” by passing spending cuts and a short-term debt ceiling hike.

If the House Republican leadership is presenting a united front, conservatives inside and outside Congress are doing anything but. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined stalwarts like Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) in opposing the deal. Rep. Allen West (R-FL) and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) threw their support behind Boehner.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page and Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol declared that to vote against Boehner is to side with Obama. Talk radio is mostly sounding a skeptical note. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is apparently still negotiating with Vice President Joe Biden.

The debate is in many respects a replay of April’s government shutdown fracas, with potentially greater consequences. Republican leaders want to avoid a crisis for which they believe they will be blamed politically. While controlling just one half of one third of the federal government, they do not want to share “co-ownership of a bad economy,” in McConnell’s phrase, with President Obama. Let’s get some spending cuts, declare victory, and live to fight another day.

Yet their conservative critics, many of whom insist the deadline the president has imposed is overhyped at best, respond: The national debt now stands at $14.3 trillion. We are being asked to allow Washington to borrow even more. When does the day for fighting actually come?

The White House has done nothing but pour fuel on the fire. Press secretary Jay Carney on Wednesday likened what will happen if Republicans fail to act to the movie Sophie’s Choice, in which a mother had to choose which of her children to save in a Nazi death camp. Obama is still hinting he will veto a Boehner-like plan if it reaches his desk, but it is hard to imagine he will be willing to face those political consequences at this late date.

Meanwhile, conservatives seeking drastic cuts in federal spending sound like the Irish Americans this writer met in South Boston pubs years ago, downing their drinks while muttering a Gaelic phrase. The supposed English translation of their toast? “Our day will come.”

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/07/28/get-in-line

FEARMONGER FRIDAY: Obama Administration Will Announce Which Bills Will Be Paid, Which Not, After Markets Close on Friday

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, July 28, 2011, 5:44 PM

Get Ready for Fearmonger Friday–

ABC reported, via Free Republic:

If there is no clear path out of this morass by tomorrow, sources say that administration officials will likely brief the public on how the Treasury Department will try to handle the bills Congress mandates that the government pay given a situation where Congress has not given them a way to do so.

Look for that briefing to come no earlier than Friday after the markets close at 4 p.m. ET, sources say.

Officials are most concerned about paying the interest on the existing debt, since failure to do so would result in default and almost certain immediate market panic, as well as questions about how Treasury would be able to roll over a pre-existing $87 billion in debt that comes due next week.

After that — a list of priorities, not all of which that can be met. Social Security checks? Medicare? Government workers? Pentagon contractors? Troops’ salaries? The FBI?

Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have been talking privately about a possible way forward should Boehner’s bill fail in the Senate, which seems likely, according to sources familiar with the talks.

Any path forward if the House GOP bill fails in the Senate would likely be some compromise between the House Speaker John Boehner’s bill that would raise the debt ceiling for six months and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s, which would raise it through the beginning of 2013. Their two proposals each seem doomed to fail in the other’s chamber.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/fear-monger-friday-obama-administration-will-announce-which-bills-will-be-paid-which-not-after-market-closes-on-friday/

Busting Posse Comitatus: Military Cops Arrest Civilians in Florida City

I just posted about this stuff yesterday. 

 

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 28, 2011

In Homestead, Florida, Posse Comitatus is dead. The Air Force now responds to civilian crime in the small city, population around 30,000.

photoMilitary “crime stoppers” violate Posse Comitatus in Florida. Photo from Homestead ARB website.

“Here at Homestead Air Reserve Base we have the Crime Stop hotline that allows anyone either on base or off the installation to anonymously report a crime,” explains the Homestead Air Reserve Base website. “If you know of a crime that has been committed, if you see a crime in progress, or if you see a suspicious person, vehicle, or situation that makes you feel a crime may be occurring, call the Security Forces Crime Stop Hotline…”

On July 15, military police – known as Security Forces patrolmen – detained a criminal suspect at a Circle K in until Miami-Dade police arrived.

“Crime prevention is everyone’s responsibility, the better informed we are the safer we can make the installation and the surrounding community,” said t. Juan Lemus, Security Forces Police Services Chief.

Crime prevention off military bases is the responsibility of civilian police, not the military. In 1878, following Reconstruction, the Posse Comitatus Act was passed. It limited the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The statute prohibits Army and Air Force personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

Infowars.com has reported numerous violations of Posse Comitatus since September 11, 2001.

In 2009, the National Guard provided “security” in Kingman, Arizona. The Coast Guard, under the Department of Homeland Security, is now exempt from the Act.

The military participated in a checkpoint along with Tennessee cops and Homeland Security in April of 2009. The governor and state representatives were not aware of the illegal collaboration when contacted by the Alex Jones Show.

In 2008, the Marine Corps Air and Ground Combat Center and the California Highway Patrol used the Christmas holiday as an excuse to collaborate on a drunk driving checkpoint in San Bernardino County.

Following a shooting in Alabama, the Army was dispatched from Fort Rucker to patrol the streets of Samson in 2009.

Pittsburgh mayor Luke Ravenstahl called in the National guard to help in “domestic” disputes in 2009. Ravenstahl used a snow emergency as an excuse. He went on television and said “be advised that you will begin to see National Guard Humvees in some of your neighborhoods beginning this evening.”

The above represents just a small sampling of the military violating Posse Comitatus. The Act was violated in earnest following Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The devastating storm proved to be a beta test for military violations of the law.

NORTHCOM announced in 2008 it would use battle-hardened troops from Iraq for “civil unrest and crowd control” in the United States. On September 30, 2008, the Pentagon announced the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team would be an “on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks,” the Army Times reported.

The mission soon expanded from disasters to every day police activity.

The firewall between military and civilian police duties was demolished with the passage of H.R. 5122, also known as the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007. It allowed the president to declare martial law under revisions to the Insurrection Act, and take charge of United States National Guard troops without state governor authorization when public order has been lost and the state and its constituted authorities cannot enforce the law.

The bill was repealed in 2008, but this has not stopped the military, numerous federal agencies, and the Department of Homeland Security from blurring the distinctions between military, federal and local police responsibilities.

According to John R. Brinkerhoff, acting associate director for national preparedness of FEMA from 1981 to 1983, “the Posse Comitatus Act is not only irrelevant but also downright dangerous to the proper and effective use of military forces for domestic duties.”

Brinkerhoff cites the Quadrennial Defense Review for 2001 that has declared homeland security to be the primary mission of the Department of Defense.

Brinkerhoff is a longtime martial law advocate. He borrowed his ideas on martial law from then FEMA director, Louis O. Guiffrida. In 1970 at the Army War College, Guiffrida outlined his plan for martial law in case of a national uprising by black militants. The paper advocated the roundup and transfer to “assembly centers or relocation camps” of at least 21 million “American Negroes,” the Miami Herald reported on July 5, 1987, during the Iran-Contra hearings.

Canceling Posse Comitatus is not about a benevolent Pentagon helping strapped local officials and over-burdened local cops save people from car accidents or the ravages of hurricanes and tornadoes. It has little to do with rioting “Negroes.”

It’s about imposing martial law. Propaganda campaigns portraying uniformed soldiers wielding the jaws of life soften people up for the presence of troops on the streets. Military checkpoints in California and Tennessee have nothing to do with drunk drivers or seat belts. They acclimate the public to soldiers manning checkpoints like they do in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Quadrennial Defense Review for 2001′s declaration that homeland security is the primary mission of the Department of Defense is particularly dangerous now that the government with the help of the corporate media has shifted the threat of terrorism from distant cave-dwelling Muslims to local “far right” extremists.

http://www.infowars.com/busting-posse-comitatus-military-cops-arrest-civilians-in-florida-city/

TSA readying new behavior detection plan for airport checkpoints

July 28, 2011

The federal government is planning to introduce new behavior detection techniques at airport checkpoints as soon as next month, Transportation Security Administration chief John Pistole said Thursday.

TSA already has “behavior detection officers” at 161 airports nationwide looking for travelers exhibiting physiological or psychological signs that a traveler might be a terrorist. However, Pistole said TSA is preparing to move to an approach that employs more conversation with travelers—a method that has been employed with great success in Israel.

“I’m very much interested in expanding the behavior detection program, upgrading it if you will, in a way that allows us to….have more interaction with a passsenger just from a discussion which may be able to expedite the physical screening aspects,” Pistole said during an appearance at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado. “So, we’ve looked at what works around the world, some outstanding examples and we are planning to do some new things in the near future here.”

Pistole declined to elaborate on the enhanced behavior detection program but said it would “probably” be announced in August. During an on-stage interview with CNN’s Jeanne Meserve, Pistole acknowledged that the Israeli techniques have been carefully examined.

“There’s a lot—under that Israeli model—a lot that is done that is obviously very effective,” he said. However, critics have said the Israeli program is too time consuming to use consistently at U.S. airports and may involve a degree of religious and racial profiling that would draw controversy in the U.S.

Pistole also said TSA is planning to test out some new methods for screening children in the wake of highly-publicized videos of children screaming as they were patted down at airport checkpoints. The TSA chief said adults have used children as suicide bombers before in other contexts and could do so through an airport, but there may still be better ways to screen kids.

“I think we can do a different way of screening children that recognizes that the very high likelihood they do not have a bomb on them,” Pistole said. ”I think under our new protocols we would see very few patdowns of children.” Instead, parents would be more involved in the process of helping TSA personnel figure out why a child is setting off alarms.

Pistole said adjusting screening for the elderly is more complicated because a large number of people on terrorist watch and enhanced screening lists are older. However, another pilot program is underway underway to identify people who have traveled very frequently for years and who could get an expedited screening.

Posted by Josh Gerstein 06:10 PM
By phoebe53 Posted in TSA