Does the gay agenda supersede the human agenda?

Gays and lesbians are human beings. Obama's politics strip their humanity and put them in a box. Photo: Associated Press
Kevin Jackson

WASHINGTON, May 13, 2012 — A president’s singular agendum should be the betterment of the entire nation, not various segments. President Obama’s agenda on gay issues is not evolving, it’s evolved. Most conservatives don’t care about a president’s sexual past, present, or future. But we do care when the gay agenda supersedes the human agenda.

My discovery of “gay” was fairly benign. I was around 12 years old, and my grandfather had stopped to gas up, before we left Dallas. As my grandfather pumped gas, I saw what I thought to be at the time, “the prettiest man I had ever seen.” He was very well-dressed, but noticeably different from what I had been raised to think of a man. He was perfectly dressed in a tan jumpsuit, and he had a beret to match.  I remember he carried a matching clutch that looped around his neck and was tucked just below his armpit.

As a kid from the country, I had never seen such style in my life. I had to know what I was seeing, so I whispered for my grandmother to look at the man as he walked by. My grandmother took a stealthy glance, then whispered to me, “He’s funny.”

I had no idea what “funny” meant, but would learn over time. Until further revelations, I just knew that I wasn’t “funny.”

Over time, I altered my perception of what a man is. I would further learn of all the variations in how people form that make the idea of gender confusing at times. I developed compassion for people in these areas, and learned to respect the idea that the human body is a complicated creation, which the mind can complicate to unfathomable degrees.

Understanding that everybody doesn’t think as I do or act as I do, I learned not moralize on the conditions of others, to just let them be. I recognized that these “different” people I described were of all races, ethnicities, creeds, and so on.

As a youth, I thought mainly white people were gay. To be gay in the black culture was almost unheard of, or so I was conditioned to think. Prior to my exposure to “pretty man,” I had only heard of gays anecdotally, and I do recall having certain feelings or suspicions about some males and females I had met. I remember that blacks were simply not supposed to be gay, particularly black boys. We were to be tough. Our role was to love women and lots of them.

In early adulthood, I recognized a very different world from what black culture had taught me. Blacks were just as gay as whites, whites were just as poor as blacks, and so on. I learned that these nice neat boxes that the world kept trying to put people in just didn’t fit.

As I traveled, I found that there were all these same “different” people all over the world. I learned that transsexuals were treated much the same almost everywhere I went. Cross-dressers were gawked at almost universally. Being gay was discouraged, to say the least. I got it.

Cross-dresser, gay and transexual are all part of the human condition. We can argue the nature nurture theory; nevertheless it is a bit of both.

You can’t legislate people in issues such as this, which is the problem with Obama. Obama wants to carve out rules that won’t make it better for the LGBT, but will have quite the opposite impact. All the rules that were carved out for blacks essentially remove black people from being part of the human race. The best thing that the LGBT have is their humanity, not some conforming box.

Without creating books like “Billy Has Two Black Parents,” black people managed to overcome all the adversity of slavery and the lack of civil rights. The understanding of black culture didn’t come from books, it came from people realizing the contribution that blacks have made and seeing it with their own eyes. Who knows if some of history’s most famous blacks were gay or wished they were another gender.  If you told me that George Washington Carver had dressed in women’s clothes, that would not diminish his accomplishments to the world in the least. Nor do Carver’s accomplishments have more impact on America because he was black. Peanut butter is delicious, regardless of Carver’s sexuality, ethnicity, and any other proclivities he may have had.

You would think that we would have learned something by now about how to deal with people, and government leaders would lead by example, and not attempt to legislate thought. Despite what people may believe, Civil Rights laws are not the reason Obama is president. Obama is president, because people in America long ago abandoned focusing on color—save the racists who voted for Obama strictly because he was black. For the most part, the people who voted for Obama did so because they felt he was going to be a transformational figure in American politics, not gay politics or black politics.

There has been a lot of money spent on removing people from the human race, and putting them in boxes. Obama wants to do the same for the LGBT, because of his life experiences and his evolution. Seventeen trillion dollars has been spent on the evolution of “helping blacks,” and I don’t see a lot of progress at the Main Street level. How much money is America willing spend on LGBT agenda? How many more manuals and training sessions do we need for Americans to treat people as humans?

For the most part, Americans interact with people based on our needs and their performance. I choose my friends based on common core values, without moralizing about those who values don’t necessarily agree with mine. I don’t have to have gay friends in order to not be homophobic. I don’t need white friends to prove I’m not racist.

All men are created equal. It’s time that Obama stop with the politicizing various agendas, and focus on the human agenda, the American agenda.


One comment on “Does the gay agenda supersede the human agenda?

  1. Reblogged this on Citizen Tom and commented:
    I like what Kevin Jackson says, but there is a certain ambiguity. What exactly does he want President Barack Obama to stop doing? I know what I want. I don’t want our political leaders to enforce the pretense that any of us have special rights just because we have a special identity as a minority, a homosexual, a disabled person, and so forth. Most of the time government cannot do anything to improve our situation. As Jackson suggests, the more government tries to help us, the worst it gets for us. When any of us are put into a special box, we can isolated and set apart. Then instead of being responsible for ourselves, government officials can makes us responsible to them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s